<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [LWC 51] The Price of Pragmatism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.minimumtempo.com/2008/07/27/51-the-price-of-pragmatism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.minimumtempo.com/2008/07/27/51-the-price-of-pragmatism/</link>
	<description>minimum tempo is about anime, manga, music, and games. mostly.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lelangir</title>
		<link>http://www.minimumtempo.com/2008/07/27/51-the-price-of-pragmatism/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>lelangir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minimumtempo.com/?p=642#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mike&lt;/strong&gt;: Art vs. entertainment? Hmm, I guess I should write up my own thoughts on that sooner than later. But I don&#039;t know if that argument can justify nor pertain to &quot;the price&quot; of pragmatism - not that that was what you were addressing, though.

I don&#039;t know if equating &quot;worth&quot; to money is something that&#039;s even possible. I don&#039;t know, I wouldn&#039;t really hope so, although given money itself, not equating things to money seems hardly easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mike</strong>: Art vs. entertainment? Hmm, I guess I should write up my own thoughts on that sooner than later. But I don&#8217;t know if that argument can justify nor pertain to &#8220;the price&#8221; of pragmatism &#8211; not that that was what you were addressing, though.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if equating &#8220;worth&#8221; to money is something that&#8217;s even possible. I don&#8217;t know, I wouldn&#8217;t really hope so, although given money itself, not equating things to money seems hardly easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [52] Microcosmic Ergo Proxy: The Paradigmatic Narrative &#124; Super Fanicom</title>
		<link>http://www.minimumtempo.com/2008/07/27/51-the-price-of-pragmatism/comment-page-1/#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator>[52] Microcosmic Ergo Proxy: The Paradigmatic Narrative &#124; Super Fanicom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minimumtempo.com/?p=642#comment-1500</guid>
		<description>[...] [51] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [51] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.minimumtempo.com/2008/07/27/51-the-price-of-pragmatism/comment-page-1/#comment-1486</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minimumtempo.com/?p=642#comment-1486</guid>
		<description>Finnegans Wake was useless for me primarily because while I could understand parts of it, I believe a novel&#039;s primary role is to inform. While this statement of his &#039;what is clear and concise can&#039;t deal with reality, for to be real is to be surrounded by mystery&#039; is correct for me, it doesn&#039;t mean that clear and concise works cannot deal with reality. There&#039;s a lot of mystery even in the most minimalist prose of Hemingway, because people are still investigating them until now. It is still shrouded in mystery, it deals with reality, but it also is clear and concise. 

I&#039;m basically subjective in equating a book&#039;s worth. I just do that with regard to my satisfaction, and nothing else. I&#039;m sure some intellectuals will orgasm from FW. For me, however, I just think it&#039;s the worst book I&#039;ve read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finnegans Wake was useless for me primarily because while I could understand parts of it, I believe a novel&#8217;s primary role is to inform. While this statement of his &#8216;what is clear and concise can&#8217;t deal with reality, for to be real is to be surrounded by mystery&#8217; is correct for me, it doesn&#8217;t mean that clear and concise works cannot deal with reality. There&#8217;s a lot of mystery even in the most minimalist prose of Hemingway, because people are still investigating them until now. It is still shrouded in mystery, it deals with reality, but it also is clear and concise. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m basically subjective in equating a book&#8217;s worth. I just do that with regard to my satisfaction, and nothing else. I&#8217;m sure some intellectuals will orgasm from FW. For me, however, I just think it&#8217;s the worst book I&#8217;ve read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
